Jonathan M Davis <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis <> 2011-05-16 10:44:52 
PDT ---
Implicitly converting to the same-size _unsigned_ integral type might be fine,
but converting to a signed type would be a narrowing conversion. I'd still
argue that converting between any of the character types and any of the
integral types should require a cast though simply because they're not only
different types, they're different types of types. The character types are for
characters and the integral types are for integers. Regardless, no implicit
conversion should be permitted when it's a narrowing conversion. Narrowing
conversions should require casts.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to