--- Comment #16 from yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> 2011-06-11 08:38:50 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > I'm still fairly sure I've seen Walter say no to this request somewhere.
> > If I
> > can find it I'll change the report to spec/enhancement.
> This isn't an enhancement. That the compiler doesn't behave according to the
> spec is an outright bug.
> It might be a case of removing the statement from the spec. But
> - it won't stop people wanting the compiler to warn of an unused local
> variable, so this would remain valid albeit as an enhancement request
> - any clue of why Walter may have changed his mind about this?
All I can find is
If the spec is wrong, then this _is_ a valid enhancement _and_ a valid spec
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------