http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1553
Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> 2011-07-01 19:32:08 PDT --- But why couldn't a delegate be written for reverse iteration? And if it does exactly the same thing for both foreach and foreach_reverse, I don't really see the problem. Granted, it may be a bit weird, but I don't see the bug. Though truth be told, I've been wondering whether foreach_reverse is actually supposed to be sticking around, given the general move towards ranges and the fact that foreach_reverse isn't actually mentioned in TDPL (at least, it's not in the index). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------