http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2779
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> 2011-07-22 08:10:42 PDT --- Fair point. I still fear this feature would cause more confusion than convenience, particularly because function overloading rules are already so complex. As an example, changing the type of one element in a tuple becomes a surprising maintenance liability. In brief, I think we shouldn't change the language such that writing f(x) may or may not expand automatically and depending on certain conditions into f(x1, x2, ..., xn). I actually very strongly believe it would be a net liability. I'll let Walter decide on this. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
