http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
klickverbot <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #22 from klickverbot <[email protected]> 2011-07-24 07:42:16 PDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > class Foo {} > > class Bar : public Foo {} > > void main() {} > > There are no attributes as such in your example. And I don't see anything > that > isn't meaningful. So what do you mean? I think bearophile is referring to the �public� protection attribute in the SuperClass. This is explicitly allowed by the grammar, but I don't know off hand if it actually has any effect in the current implementation, other than giving C++ programmers a wrong sense of coziness maybe. ;) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
