http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6427
Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> 2011-08-02 11:06:42 PDT --- 1. This compiles with the current compiler on github. 2. I'm not even 100% sure this is supposed to compile, since the constructor isn't immutable. That might only be necessary when the whole struct is immutable though. I don't remember for sure and would have to check in TDPL (which I don't have on me at the moment). 3. While this should certainly compile correctly based on the language spec (or not compile depending on the spec). I would serious advise against having const or immutable variables in a struct, since you can then never assign to them even if they're not const or immutable. If they're on the heap, it's not as big a deal, but a struct like S would be useless in arrays (since all of the values would be stuck as S.init) and every instance of it would be effectively immutable regardless of whether the object itself was typed as immutable or not. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------