http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6511


Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |clugd...@yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #3 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2011-08-23 01:29:13 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The given code example now works. But this:
> 
> 
> T foo(T)() {
>     T[1] a = [1];
>     a[] += a[];
>     return a[0];
> }
> static assert(foo!long() == 2); // OK
> static assert(foo!int() == 2); // error
> void main() {}
> 
> 
> Gives:
> 
> test.d(3): Error: _arraySliceSliceAddass_i cannot be interpreted at compile
> time, because it has no available source code
> test.d(7): Error: cannot evaluate foo() at compile time
> test.d(7): Error: static assert  (foo() == 2) is not evaluatable at compile
> time
> 
> This behaviour difference between long and int is not good. Do you prefer me 
> to
> reopen this bug or to open a new one?

A new one. Surprisingly, it actually has *nothing* in common with this bug.
This bug was actually a problem with array slicing, and didn't require array
operations.
The new case is that the array operations which are special-cased in the
runtime don't have special case treatment in the CTFE engine, since CTFE
doesn't have access to the source code of druntime. The array ops which aren't
special-cased don't use druntime code, so they should all work.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to