--- Comment #5 from Peter Alexander <> 2011-09-23 
00:49:09 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I would think you need to ensure EAX points to somewhere readable to avoid a
> > seg fault. E.g.:
> I think you misread the bug report.  It's about the compiler crashing, not the
> resulting code.  Yes, it's slightly odd code, in that on x86, the first arg to
> main is argc, an int and not a pointer.  But that's irrelevant.

That's correct.

I have code that uses this is a more correct way, this is just a minimal
example of it happening. The compiler should never (with reason) seg fault.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to