http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6856
--- Comment #4 from Leandro Lucarella <[email protected]> 2011-11-01 05:46:43 PDT --- BTW, "in" contracts seems to be very ill defined, because overriding a method with an "in" contract without specifying an "in" contract should inherit the contract from the base class/interface, not remove the contract completely. You have to repeat the contract from the base class manually, that sucks. There should be some syntax to remove the contract instead, maybe something like: void f() in delete body { // ... } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
