--- Comment #13 from Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> 2011-11-10
13:41:52 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > You may be misunderstanding me. I agree this is a bug. I'll try to be
> > clearer:
> > 1. inout(const(T)) should resolve to const(T) or immutable(T) upon exit from
> > inout scope. That it resolves to const(T) right now is a bug.
> > 2. immutable(T) and inout(T) can legally implicitly cast to
> > inout(const(T)).
> > This is an enhancement.
> Hm ok. I believe you are right for a possible interpretation of the language
> spec. It states that nothing converts implicitly to inout, that immutable and
> inout convert to const but it does not make any mention of what converts to
> inout const. Ergo it is contradictory and we are both right.
> But 1. is not worth fixing if 2. is not implemented, therefore the bugfix
> implies the enhancement. =)
2 can be forced with a cast. 1 cannot be worked around.
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------