--- Comment #6 from Adam D. Ruppe <destructiona...@gmail.com> 2011-12-02
07:47:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I mean a null could mean a null string, not a null string.
I oversimplified the test - in the original code it came from,
it was more like
string a = null;
ret ~= a;
which gets the same result in 2.056
I haven't tried git though. I'm not sure how to use that yet!
> I almost think the code in question should fail to compile for being too
With null itself... maybe. In the case of string, ~= null could
have two meanings, but one of them is pretty obviously a no-op, so it's
probably not what you meant.
If a variable happens to be null, maybe doing nothing is what you wanted,
but in that case, the variable has an exact type declared so it's not
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------