http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=664
--- Comment #13 from Don <[email protected]> 2011-12-20 06:42:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > and then (possibly*) provide some other mechanism for identifying > > if a function is C-style variadic. is() expressions are just about > > the ugliest thing in the language already, I'm loathe to recommend > > making them even uglier. > > Why only C-style variadics? D-style variadics with typeinfo just as well need > to be considered. Of course, with typesafe variadics we can feasibly just > keep > the type and just discard the ... .... You're right. Fortunately, I don't think it's any different. -TypeTuple of the function parameter types +TypeTuple of the function parameter types. For C- and D-style variadic functions, only the non-variadic parameters are included. For typesafe variadic functions, the ... is ignored. Can you improve on that? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
