http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7135
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara <[email protected]> 2011-12-31 01:01:24 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think (and perhaps I'm wrong) that the signature with ... and the one > without > must be equivalent. The ... makes a difference only in the call syntax, but in > fact still passes an array. (Note that the variadics ending with "T[] > param..." > are not unsafe C-style variadics.) Please advise - thanks! Hmm, current compiler always raise an error against the difference of variadic argument kind (non-variarics vs typesafe-variadics vs C-style variadics). But, from http://d-programming-language.org/abi.html > The variadic part is converted to a dynamic array and the rest is the same as > for non-variadic functions. So, in ABI layer, (..., T[]) and (..., T[]...) might be same... -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
