http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> 2012-01-20 23:21:33 
PST ---
I believe that the recent changes to IFTI to make dynamic array types
tail-const for IFTI essentially fixes this. The issue with static arrays
remains, but I'm increasingly convinced that not havin static arrays
automatically treated as dynamic arrays with range-based functions is  _good_
thing, since they're not ranges, and slicing them can be dangerous. If
anything, I'd argue that static arrays should _never_ implicitly convert to
dynamic arrays and that they should always have to be explicitly sliced to do
the conversion.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to