http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148
Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2012-01-20 23:21:33 PST --- I believe that the recent changes to IFTI to make dynamic array types tail-const for IFTI essentially fixes this. The issue with static arrays remains, but I'm increasingly convinced that not havin static arrays automatically treated as dynamic arrays with range-based functions is _good_ thing, since they're not ranges, and slicing them can be dangerous. If anything, I'd argue that static arrays should _never_ implicitly convert to dynamic arrays and that they should always have to be explicitly sliced to do the conversion. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
