Vladimir Panteleev <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Panteleev <> 2012-01-26 
10:39:05 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I vote for doing the opposite of C++ and introducing a @implicit tag for
> constructors that are to be used in the fashion I depicted.

If we had opImplicitCast (for implicit casting of "this" to another type), this
could have been named opImplicitCast_r (for implicit casting of another type to

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to