Don <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #4 from Don <> 2012-02-01 04:18:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> As you can see, it make a struct literal with every field accounted for.
> So this is a bug in the constfolding/ctfe code.

Not exactly. It's a compiler structural problem: there's no way to specify a
struct literal with missing fields. Struct static initializers can do it, but
struct literals cannot.

I think the solution is to merge struct literals with struct static
initializers, as it says in a TODO in the code.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to