http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5713


yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yebbl...@gmail.com


--- Comment #10 from yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> 2012-02-06 02:38:35 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Then maybe we need a "wrong_specs" tag in Bugzilla, for the situations where
> the compiler is working as the spec say, but where the spec themselves look
> wrong.

The problem with this is that it is completely subjective.  The line between 'I
wish D had this' and 'It is a design error that D doesn't have this' varies
from person to person, and without hard rules having a keyword to distinguish
between them is useless.

I don't have a solution for this, but the people fixing bugs and implementing
features are well aware that enhancement means 'not a priority' not 'won't
happen'.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to