yebblies <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #10 from yebblies <> 2012-02-06 02:38:35 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Then maybe we need a "wrong_specs" tag in Bugzilla, for the situations where
> the compiler is working as the spec say, but where the spec themselves look
> wrong.

The problem with this is that it is completely subjective.  The line between 'I
wish D had this' and 'It is a design error that D doesn't have this' varies
from person to person, and without hard rules having a keyword to distinguish
between them is useless.

I don't have a solution for this, but the people fixing bugs and implementing
features are well aware that enhancement means 'not a priority' not 'won't

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to