yebblies <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |
           Platform|x86                         |All
            Version|2.029                       |D2

--- Comment #3 from yebblies <> 2012-02-15 00:45:34 EST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > Ok, I've undeprecated rand_seed, sigh. I was hoping I'd eliminate rand() 
> > entirely from this release, but Walter pointed out it would break too much 
> > code. So I left rand() and rand_seed() as deprecated. Now I only left 
> > rand() deprecated so at least the static constructor works.
> I think the right fix for that is for the compiler to not complain about
> deprecated symbol usage if the usage is in the same module the deprecated
> symbol is defined in.

Is this really necessary?  It sounds like it could be done using private
symbols and public deprecated symbols.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to