http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7105
--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon <s...@iname.com> 2012-02-19 06:37:31 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > For example, what would be the meaning of the following declarations? > > > > inout(int)[] delegate(inout(int)[] dg; > > inout(int)[] foo(inout(int)[]delegate(inout(int)[] dg, inout(int)[] x){ ... > > } > > Both of these would be syntax errors, because the brackets aren't matched. > > But I see the ambiguity now. Does the inout status belong to the delegate > itself or to the function of which it is a parameter? > > If the signature of dg is invalid because it doesn't pass the inout status > through, then in principle it could be taken to belong to the outer function. > Which would be passing the inout status through to the delegate rather than as > a return. > > I'll think about it and continue the discussion on the newsgroup. digitalmars.D "inout and function/delegate parameters" On web interface: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/jhr0t6$24v6$1...@digitalmars.com -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------