http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7543
--- Comment #9 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-03-09 16:05:28 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Indeed. The point is that there are two possible interpretations of the > opApply signature, and the spec isn't clear on which applies: > > (a) the constancy is passed through to the delegate > (b) the delegate has an inout parameter in its own right > > See the newsgroup thread I've already linked to for a more detailed discussion > of this. The main issue is that both (a) and (b) are useful in different contexts. Otherwise this would be a no-brainer. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
