--- Comment #2 from 2012-03-16 18:44:11 PDT ---
Maybe you have gone a bit too much far with your fix, Kenji Hara.

In my example code here I used @property:

@property ref double y(ref A a) {

But your patch allows that syntax even without @property.

Your patch allows _very_ nice and noise-free code like:

[1, 2, -3, 4].filter!(x => x > 0).map!(x => x ^^ 0.2).writeln;

But I think it undermines the meaning and usefulness of the -property compiler
switch and the meaning of @property.

So I suggest to think a bit more about this, to keep the nice things, and to
not throw away two baby waters.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to