http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7854
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2012-04-12 23:07:41 PDT --- < I'm not exactly talking about binding or calling convention, I'm more talking < about types. To me, the two are orthogonal. Whereas I would argue that since you're declaring a C function, it should be a _C_ function and therefore not include features which C doesn't have. The only reason that I think that permitting pure and nothrow on C functions makes any sense is out of pure necessity. > extern(C) int pipe(ref int[2] fds); I would expect this to simply be extern(C) int pipe(int* fds); because what C does is pass a pointer, not a fixed-size array. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
