http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7657
Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> 2012-04-19 19:13:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Except that if a template hasn't been initialized, it doesn't even really > _exist_ as far as the compiler is concerned. It's a template for something, > not > an actual function or type. > > So, while I can see why you'd want this, I just don't see how it could be done > with how templates are implemented. Yes, and come to think of it it would be dangerous to allow this feature. If at a later time a template had its return type changed to 'auto' it would break existing code that relied on ReturnType working on such a template. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
