http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7947
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from [email protected] 2012-04-20 04:39:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > And, long years, typeof(template) returns void. > Therefore, typeof(x => x) == void is current implementation design. > > I don't know why typeof(template) returns void, but changing the behavior will > break some existing meta-programming codes. I think it's acceptable to break such meta-programming code. I think pragma(msg, typeof(tem)); should show something useful when tem is a template function (like the name of the template if it has a name, or a lambda template plus line number if it has no name). There are people working on an algorithm to automatically synthesize good names for anonymous functions, but probably it's overkill in D "Naming Anonymous JavaScript Functions": http://blog.getfirebug.com/2011/04/28/naming-anonymous-javascript-functions/ http://code.google.com/p/querypoint-debugging/downloads/detail?name=NamingJSFunctions.pdf -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
