--- Comment #14 from 2012-04-20 14:49:05 PDT ---
I've taken a look here:

Kenji Hara sasy:

>The same name with core.stdc.sprintf is very confusing. And std.string.format 
>returns new string, but core.stdc.sprintf write the formatted string into 
>specified buffer. The two behaviors are quite different.<

Andrei Alexandrescu says:

>There's no problem with core.stdc.sprintf bearing the same name as 
>std.format.sprintf. Phobos has had such duplicate names for years without a 

I agree that Phobos has some name clashes. But I don't agree it's a good thing.
It should be avoided if possible for newly added names.
And I agree the behavior of the new functions is different from the C
functions. So I agree with Kenji Hara, they should have different names.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to