Don <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #1 from Don <> 2012-04-23 06:04:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Since BigInt %= BigInt seems to work correctly, how about making it construct 
> a
> BigInt from the long/ulong and using that?  It can later be replaced with an
> implementation optimised to long/ulong once that has been written and tested.

It's a template problem, (related to implicit conversion) not a mathematical
problem. At the time I wrote the code, I could not find any way to select the
correct function in all cases, if I allowed long and ulong.

At least one of the bugs I was hitting was fixed during the last three
releases, so it is probably possible to implement it now.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to