http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7973
Don <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Don <[email protected]> 2012-04-23 06:04:31 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Since BigInt %= BigInt seems to work correctly, how about making it construct > a > BigInt from the long/ulong and using that? It can later be replaced with an > implementation optimised to long/ulong once that has been written and tested. It's a template problem, (related to implicit conversion) not a mathematical problem. At the time I wrote the code, I could not find any way to select the correct function in all cases, if I allowed long and ulong. At least one of the bugs I was hitting was fixed during the last three releases, so it is probably possible to implement it now. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
