http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650
--- Comment #13 from Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> 2012-04-27 03:29:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > With "scope(success) ++_length" in RBTree._add > the property calls are not inlined. Gr... I hate how dmd makes poor decisions about inlining and then won't let you force the issue... Your optimization ignores the multiple option, it will have to be fixed. > Then new RBTree!Elem allocates 33 bytes spending lots of time and space > for the unused 31 bytes. This will be fixed when allocators are added. I think we can hold off on this optimization. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------