--- Comment #15 from 2012-05-19 19:28:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> In a more general context, there's nothing to say a "pointer to member" must 
> be a distinct type.

It depends on what you mean by "pointer to member".

If you say a VARIABLE is a pointer to a member, then yes, it doesn't have to
have a distinct type.

If you say a TYPE is a pointer to a member, then (by definition), it is a
distinct type. (Otherwise, how do you distinguish between a type that is a
pointer-to-member vs. one that isn't?)

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to