http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8161
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2012-05-29 23:38:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > A @property function has two parameters is now allowed for UFCS property > > setter. > > > @property foo(T)(T obj, int val) { ... } > > void main() { > > S s; > > s.foo = 1; // translated to .foo(s, 1), it's valid. > > } > > Yeah, because that's a free function. It's valid to use it as a property, so > it > makes sense for it to compile with @property. The example that I gave with two > arguments was a member function, which already has the invisible this > parameter, so it won't work as a property. > > The point is that any function which cannot be legally used as a property > function should not compile when marked with @property and compiled with > -property. OK. I got an understanding. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------