--- Comment #2 from John Belmonte <> 2012-06-09 20:39:07 PDT ---
I do prefer this being an option to finish() rather than a separate join()
function.  We all understand what finish() does and it's not a stretch at all
to accept that there's blocking and non-blocking invocations (as evidenced by
current doc needing to clearly state that it's non-blocking).

Also I don't think the docs need a big example for the blocking case.  It
should suffice to say that blocking invocation only makes sense when task
results aren't needed (otherwise the corresponding Task.*Force() calls would
provide the blocking).

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to