Don <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #3 from Don <> 2012-06-27 00:06:13 PDT ---
It is currently possible to declare 'const int' variables even though they are
identical to 'immutable int' ones. This is similar.

And consider:

const[] foo(S y) pure { ... }

With this proposal, that's OK for struct S, as long as the struct has a
But if S has no pointers, the return value needs to be immutable.
That's just annoying.

This proposal doesn't add any value.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to