--- Comment #4 from 2012-06-29 16:47:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > Isn't it a function call where the parens were left out?
> It would be if the functions didn't have any parameters, but they both do, so 
> I
> don't know quite what the compiler thinks that it is.
> Regardless, lol!"rulez" results in a function named lol which takes a single
> string argument when there's already such a function (albeit non-templated)
> which exists. It's clearly a conflict no matter what you're trying to do with
> it.

I think you might have missed the second set of parentheses on the first
template function declaration.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to