http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8338



--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> 2012-07-02 20:03:22 
PDT ---
Maybe. But I'm not completely convinced that it would break all that much code
- particularly since I would have expected any code using Unqual to be written
with the intention of stripping _all_ of the qualifiers (as the documentation
says). If we don't make the change though, we need a new template similar to
Unqual (FullUnqual? RecUnqual?) which really _does_ strip all of the
qualifiers.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to