http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857
--- Comment #80 from yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> 2012-07-10 14:02:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #79) > (In reply to comment #78) > But it does seem to be down to two problems with D's design: > - structs aren't guaranteed to be safe to just bit-copy (this problem was > introduced in D2) > - we have variadics that are really just C's variadics with typeinfo added > We also have C's variadics. > Something else I should've realised earlier: Why do D class methods need to be > directly callable from C? (How does C code hold a reference to a D object, > anyway?) Indeed, is even C++ designed to accommodate this? COM classes defined in D are callable from C (and you could define other classes the same way). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
