http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7322



--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2012-07-19 09:37:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The deprecation check needs to be done where the overload set is resolved,
> wherever that is.

DotVarExp and VarExp have `hasOverloads` field that means whether the
overloaded symbol is really resolved or not.
In these cases, CastExp::semantic and AddrExp::implicitConvTo might be better
places.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to