http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #16 from David Piepgrass <[email protected]> 2012-07-25 18:55:01 PDT --- > How would the programmer suppress this warning because it's deliberate? When I wrote that, I was thinking that the developer can initialize in the constructor if he really wants it to be non-static. But now I remember that structs can't have a default constructor. Personally I think coders should be able to suppress warnings inside a pragma. But I think I heard Walter doesn't like that. Nevertheless it could easily be a mistake to use "const int Foo = 7;" instead of "enum" or "static const int", and the developer usually won't find out about the mistake without a warning. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
