Jonathan M Davis <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
           Severity|blocker                     |major

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <> 2012-08-08 12:53:49 
PDT ---
Okay. I was finally able to find a workaround by moving the test inside of
decodeImpl to outside of it, which is leaking its implementation details and
forcing a bool with the result of the test to be passed to an overload of
decodeImpl which doesn't need the test at all, but it does make it so that the
code works, and it doesn't affect the public API at all. So, I'm changing this
bug to major rather than blocker.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to