What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from 2012-08-10 10:33:29 PDT ---
The documentation doesn't seem to state the equivalence of
int[3][2] m;
int m[3][2];

and indeed the declarations are not equivalent.

int[3][2] m;
int m[2][3];

would be equivalent.

If there is a place in the documentation that does state the first
equivalence, please file a bug against the documentation.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to