http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8591


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdavisp...@gmx.com


--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> 2012-08-26 11:01:30 
PDT ---
Marking it as nothrow should be completely unnecessary. The function is
templated. nothrow should be inferred. And having to duplicate the function to
have a nothrow and non-nothrow version is definitely undesirable.

However, attribute inferrence seems to be very broken right now ( bug# 8504 ),
so it wouldn't surprise me in the least if it's not being inferred properly in
this case. Attribute inferrence seems to work _sometimes_, but I have yet to
figure out under what conditions it does. It's _supposed_ to be inferred for
all templated functions, delegates which are explicitly typed, and lambdas, but
it only works in a fraction of those circumstances.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to