http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8599
--- Comment #2 from deadalnix <deadal...@gmail.com> 2012-09-02 12:55:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > abstract is never inferred. Why would it be inferred? Functions are only > abstract if marked abstract. > > And if a function is not abstract, then it needs a body/definition, so > obviousy > it's going to fail at link time when the linker doesn't find a definition for > it. It's perfectly legal to declare a function without giving its body as long > as the linker has the body. That's how .di files work. It's also useful with > stuff like version(D_Ddoc) where there is no definition and shouldn't be one. > > This isn't a bug. You are right. I'm so dumb sometime. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
