http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7021
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2012-09-21 21:10:52 PDT --- > This is not already true for nested structs. Well, that's disgusting. There are way too many special cases here. I'd vote to just make S() identical to S.init even with nested structs. It's more consistent that way, especially since you can't have a default constructor making it so that S() can't possible refer to a default constructor. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
