http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977
--- Comment #26 from Ryuichi OHORI <r.97...@gmail.com> 2012-10-13 04:28:56 PDT --- > Your example is perfectly valid. I don't see. In the example above( http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/8b9f5471 ), the value in y is 16777216, which is greater than ushort.max. > It knows the value of both x and y, so it knows that x |= y; will work just > fine, because all of the values will fit in the correct types. If the value in > y was too large to fit in a ushort, _then_ it should give you an error, but > since it fits in a ushort just fine (and is positive, so there's no issues > with > two's complement or whatnot), the compiler knows that it's fine and allows it > without complaint. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
