http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4563
--- Comment #13 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com> 2012-10-24 11:19:11 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > Ok, I'll implement a pull and see what others think about it. > > Thank you. I think we can do even better: import foo.bar.doo; Now it's test.d(3): Error: module doo is in file 'foo\bar\doo.d' which cannot be read If 'foo' doesn't exist the error should probably be: test.d(3): Error: package 'foo' not found If 'bar' doesn't exist it should be: test.d(3): Error: package 'bar' not found in package 'foo' If 'doo' doesn't exist: test.d(3): Error: module 'doo' not found in package 'foo.bar' Also, we might consider doing informative spellchecker errors, e.g.: import std.stddio; test.d(3): Error: module 'stddio' not found in package 'std', did you mean 'stdio'? The above should probably try finding D modules that are similar to 'stddio', read their module declaration (because it might be different from the filename), and if the module declaration is similar to 'stddio' it should print that module name as a recommendation. import stdd.stdio; test.d(3): Error: package 'stdd' not found, did you mean 'std'? Here we might try finding non-empty folders with .d or .di files named similarly to 'stdd' and recommend such a folder. I don't know how hard this will be but I think it's worth pursuing. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
