http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
--- Comment #15 from Roy Crihfield <rscr...@gmail.com> 2012-10-30 21:32:47 PDT --- I think this absolutely needs to be reconsidered. The success of the same semantics in Python should be enough proof of the convenience and low risk of this feature. On top of that, the `in' operator is overloadable anyway, meaning it already has semantic ambiguity for different types. Should `~' be considered an issue since it can accept both T and T[]? Practicality seems preferable here. I think this should be reopened. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
