Andrej Mitrovic <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic <> 2012-10-30 
22:42:22 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Implementing ddoc'ed unittests entails that each unittest must have an owner
> (the preceding declaration) to put it in the right HTML tag. That would also
> solve the unittest name problem (bug 2749) with 'owner.stringof'.

A simple workaround is to look for the next element in the members list to see
if it's a unittest declaration. If it is, and it's commented and not private,
we can insert a "----%s----" code block in the previous element. This would be
done until a non-unittest block is found, or until a private/non-commented one
is found.

It's a ~20-line change to implement.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to