http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2630
Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> 2012-10-30 22:42:22 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Implementing ddoc'ed unittests entails that each unittest must have an owner > (the preceding declaration) to put it in the right HTML tag. That would also > solve the unittest name problem (bug 2749) with 'owner.stringof'. A simple workaround is to look for the next element in the members list to see if it's a unittest declaration. If it is, and it's commented and not private, we can insert a "----%s----" code block in the previous element. This would be done until a non-unittest block is found, or until a private/non-commented one is found. It's a ~20-line change to implement. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
