http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6969
--- Comment #8 from Rob T <[email protected]> 2012-11-10 01:34:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) I get weird behavior if I put in only the alias definitions. This stuct version compiles, and it probably should because sA and sB are empty with no circular referencing. struct sA() { alias sC!() sC1; } struct sB { alias sA!() sA1; } struct sC() { sB s; } But adding sA1 into sB will not compile, but I think it should compile because sA is empty and there's no circular reference back to sC. struct sA() { alias sC!() sC1; } struct sB { alias sA!() sA1; sA1 a; } struct sC() { sB b; } In fact it does compile in the non-template version as expected. struct sA { alias sC sC1; } struct sB { alias sA sA1; sA1 a; } struct sC() { sB b; } Finally, closing the loop will not compile as expected struct sA { alias sC sC1; sC1 c; // bang, we're dead. } struct sB { alias sA sA1; sA1 a; } struct sC() { sB b; } Templates and non-templates are being evaluated inconsistently, so there's definitely a bug in there somewhere. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
