http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8993
--- Comment #8 from S�nke Ludwig <[email protected]> 2012-11-10 10:38:42 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > I agree with what you say. > > But in the end this enhancement request is not enough. A detailed DEP is > probably necessary. You don't have to write it down all yourself, of course. > Once the DEP is written, you will be in a better position to rant :-) Agreed, a DIP is probably in order for this change. It would probably be enough to concentrate on the simple parts first (implicit isolated->immutable conversion and free psasing of isolated values between threads) and then implement further relaxations bit by bit (e.g. implicit scoped isolated->writable->isolated conversion). Allocating time for a proper DIP is difficult for me currently, but I guess it could be marked as work-in-progress in the wiki so that it can be completed step by step? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
