http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1012
Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> 2012-11-16 10:58:46 PST --- > I have severe misgivings about this. I concur. It seems like it just begging for trouble when providing minimal gain. Not to mention that it would harm code readability in many cases, which will therefore harm code maintainability. issue# 6082 might be reasonable to implement (I don't know), in which case the example here would compile, but that would be restricted specifically to constructors. Making it so that templates in general can be instantiated without !() if they don't need any arguments is a bad idea IHMO. And I think that this post on the newsgroup is a good example of why this is a bad idea: http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected] -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
