http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9062
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from [email protected] 2012-11-23 03:30:57 PST --- If @property is all about equivalence of fields and accessors, then &foo should not return a function pointer. IMHO obtaining the funtion pointer should be the special case. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
