http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9029
--- Comment #7 from Manu <[email protected]> 2012-11-29 10:01:54 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > > There was a proposal recently on the NG suggesting builtin types should > > > have > > > entries in the symbol table. Sounded fairly reasonable. > > > > Yeah, this is what the dragon book suggests as well. > > Huh? There is no technical difficulty whatsoever, AFAIK it was _never_ thought > to be difficult to implement. When did the difficulty come in to question? Something to do with this 'dragon book' that I don't understand? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
